Does Wildlife Co-management Acknowledge Indigenous Health? Publication from IHACC Investigators

Update by: Edris Formuli 

Congratulations to Drs. Jamie Snook, Ashlee Cunsolo, James Ford, and Sherilee Harper for their new systematic critical review titled: “The connection between wildlife co-management and indigenous well-being: What does the academic literature reveal?”. The review found that the co-management systems literature does not explicitly analyze co-management from the perspective of Indigenous health and well-being, but rather focuses on related social determinants of Indigenous Peoples’ health such as land and ecosystems, food systems and security, Indigenous knowledge systems, culture, self-determination, and colonialism. The absence of co-management research with a direct focus on Indigenous health raises questions about the risks to and prioritization of Indigenous well-being. The results of the review suggest that there are considerable opportunities to enhance co-management approaches to protect and improve the health and well-being of Indigenous communities.

Figure 1 from Snook et al., (2022) presents a synthesized list of twelve distal, intermediate, and proximal social determinants of health based on Indigenous perspectives, which was used as an analytical framework in the review.

Click here to access the publication

CITATION:

Snook, J., Cunsolo, A., Ford, J., Furgal, C., Jones-Bitton, A., & Harper, S. L. (2022). The connection between wildlife co-management and indigenous well-being: What does the academic literature reveal? Wellbeing, Space and Society, 3, 100116.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2022.100116